Is your FTZ software designed to handle today’s trade reality? The data shows what it's costing you.

PAID SPONSORSHIP— CONTENT PROVIDED BY QAD
This paid article was prepared and supplied by QAD. The views, claims, interpretations, and conclusions presented are those of QAD and the cited research authors. NAFTZ did not conduct, commission, participate in, or independently validate the survey or its findings. Publication does not constitute NAFTZ endorsement of QAD, its products or services, or the research methodology and conclusions presented.

New research from Dimensional Research, powered by AWS, and commissioned by QAD, puts hard numbers on a gap the industry already feels. As FTZ complexity grows, the software meant to manage it is falling behind.

Tariff volatility has made FTZ programs a frontline financial tool. Expansion is accelerating, zone counts are rising, and the operational demands on trade teams have intensified. Yet the infrastructure running these programs has not kept pace, and the consequences are already showing up in audits and financial results. The survey covered over 300 VP and C-level executives responsible for international trade, supply chain, and compliance at enterprise companies. 

Audit failure rates are higher than most organizations acknowledge, and outdated software is driving them.

67% of respondents reported negative FTZ audit findings in the last 11 months. 80% reported negative findings over the past two years. When asked what was driving those failures, outdated FTZ software ranked as the leading cause, ahead of process gaps, staffing issues, or training deficiencies.

87% said inadequate FTZ software caused direct financial harm to their organization. Beyond financial loss, respondents reported penalties, operational disruption, and, in the most severe cases, enforcement outcomes including facility shutdowns and criminal charges. 45% attributed audit failures specifically to limitations in FTZ software.

The core issue: software designed for a different trade environment

Most FTZ software in use today was designed for a more stable, more predictable trade environment, one where tariff schedules shifted occasionally, trade relationships were relatively settled, and compliance requirements moved slowly. That world no longer exists. Today's geopolitical volatility, the pace of tariff changes, and the complexity of multi-zone, multi-partner operations require systems that can adapt in real time. Most current platforms were not designed for that. They lack the automation to respond when conditions shift and the agility to keep compliance controls current without significant manual intervention.

FTZ Operations run across too many disconnected systems, with too little automation

97% of respondents manage daily FTZ operations across multiple software applications, including ERP systems, dedicated FTZ software, ICRS, spreadsheets, custom tools, and repurposed applications. Each system holds a piece of the compliance picture. None holds all of it.

When tariffs change, only 20% of respondents have software that updates automatically. The other 80% are absorbing that exposure manually. 80% also said their current systems are missing key capabilities needed to manage today's tariff environment, not eventually, but right now, in programs already running.

Deploying AI into a fragmented system does not solve the problem. It accelerates it.

99% of companies are using or planning to use AI to manage FTZ operations. But AI running on inconsistently reconciled, fragmented data does not improve compliance accuracy. It produces faster, more automated errors. The data foundation that makes AI reliable is precisely what outdated FTZ software cannot provide.

Zone expansion on outdated infrastructure builds exposure, not capability.

98% of respondents operate across multiple FTZ sites. 32% are actively adding new zones.

Each additional zone multiplies inventory traceability requirements, widens the audit surface area, and adds reconciliation complexity to systems already operating at their limits.

Today's trade environment has outpaced the software most FTZ programs depend on. Managing it requires platforms built for dynamic, real-time complexity. The question is no longer whether outdated software creates risk. The data shows it already has.

Download the full report at qad.com/global-trade-survey. For more information, visit QAD.com.

This paid content was provided by QAD. NAFTZ did not conduct or independently validate the research referenced in this article. The views and claims expressed are those of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect those of NAFTZ, its Board, staff, or members.